Course Goals| Essay Rubric |Journal Rubric |Vocabulary Rubric | Reading/Thinking Rubric |
Course Requirements-
Expected class decorum-
Grading Policy-
Grading Policies for Written Work/Artwork
Academic Dishonesty
1=Weak 2=Somewhat Weak 3=Average 4= Strong 5=Very Strong
1. The topic of the journal entry meets the requirements of the assignment.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2. The journal entry covers various aspects of a person's life which shows the student's understanding of that person's way of life.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3. The entries provide very descriptive explanation of that person's surroundings.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4. The organization of the journal entries are clear and easy to follow.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5. The journal entry flows smoothly from one idea to another.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6. The spelling, grammar, and punctuation in the journal is accurate.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
7. The journal entry is neatly typed or handwritten.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
8. The journal entries are bound together neatly with a cover.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
9. The journal offers various experiences and perspectives of that person's life.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
10. The effort put forth has demonstrated the full potential of the student's capability.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total Points: __________________
|
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
LEVEL OF COMPREHENSION& FOCUS |
a sophisticated thesis reveals an in-depth analysis of the text |
a sound thesis demonstrates a plausible interpretation of the text |
a clear thesis demonstrates some interpretive comprehension of the text |
a thesis demonstrates a basic understanding of the text |
the thesis is so general/simple it does not need development ; an obvious fact |
no evidence of a thesis OR the thesis does not demonstrate a reading of the text |
ORGANIZATION |
exhibits a sophisticated and coherent structure through skillful placement of ideas and effective transitioning |
exhibits a coherent structure with logical placement of ideas and smooth transitions |
exhibits a logical structure and has relatively smooth transitions |
exhibits a rudimentary structure that has fairly smooth transitions combined with some choppy ones |
much of the essay seems out of order, illogical and has very few transitions |
essay has little to no sense of logical order |
SUPPORT & FOCUS |
ideas are original, clearly developed and supported with effective, relevant, and specific references in order to analyze the text |
ideas are developed, making use of relevant and specific references in order to interpret the text |
most ideas are developed, with interpretation of the text, making use of relevant and specific references from the text |
ideas are briefly developed, using some relevant and specific references from the text combined with paraphrasing/summary |
most ideas are undeveloped, repetitive, or supported only with summary of text |
ideas are undeveloped, unsupported, or supported with irrelevant text or summary |
LEAD/INTRO. |
innovative, original introduction that indicates writer’s grasp of topic, purpose and audience |
pulls the reader into the piece, introduces the text and thesis |
standard lead and introduction to thesis – (it works) |
lead is attempted, |
lead is attempted, |
too short, non-existent, or unfitting for the essay |
CONCLUSION |
writer “comes to a conclusion”, leaving reader satisfied and thinking |
writer “comes to a conclusion” about thesis/text, leaving reader satisfied |
writer “comes to a conclusion”, ties essay together |
restates thesis, may be superficial |
short or superficial, just tacked on the end |
non-existent or does not make a point |
VOICEDiction |
utilizes terminology appropriate to genre, chooses distinct words, and varies sentence length and grammatical structure to create an original and confident voice both fitting to the purpose of the essay and intended audience |
utilizes terminology appropriate to genre, makes conscious word choice, and varies some sentence length and grammatical structure to create a convincing voice |
utilizes terminology appropriate to genre, and varies some sentence length and grammatical structure; voice is stronger in some parts of essay |
attempts to utilize terminology appropriate to genre, experiments with varied sentence length and grammatical structure; a hint of voice is present in essay |
writing shows little awareness of varying grammatical structures or word choice to fit purpose of essay; voice may only be present in lead and conclusion |
no voice and no awareness of audience demonstrated ; sentences are awkward, rambling, fragmented and/or confusing |
CONVENTIONS |
mastery of conventions: no spelling, punctuation or format errors (including MLA format & citing text) |
strong conventions: correct format; one or two reasonable errors |
a few grade-appropriate errors in format, spelling, punctuation, verb tense, or MLA format |
some grade-appropriate errors combined with careless errors in spelling, conventions, editing or MLA format |
frequent spelling/editing typing and MLA format errors |
Too many errors in spelling, conventions, or MLA format to be considered a final draft |
Reading/Thinking Journal Rubric
| Outstanding!! (Advanced) | Wow! (Proficient) | So-So (Basic) | Oops (Below Basic) |
| Quality Ø Entries show evidence of reflection about what you’re reading and about “real things” not summaries, chapters, or “stories.” Ø You always attempt deeper thinking in your writing Ø There is evidence of applying what you learn in minilessons. |
Quality Ø Entries include some reflection about what you’re reading and about “real things” but also lots of summaries, chapters, or “stories.” Ø You usually attempt deeper thinking in your writing Ø There is often evidence of applying what you learn in minilessons. |
Quality Ø Entries do not show reflection about what you’re reading and about “real things. “ Ø Sometimes you attempt deeper thinking in your writing Ø There is some evidence of applying what you learn in minilessons. |
Quality Ø Your journal has more summaries, drawings, or blank pages than reflective writing. Ø Entries are confused. They do not make sense to the reader. Ø There is no evidence of applying what you learn in minilessons |
| Quantity Ø You always write in your journal every day at school. Ø You always write in your journal at home when assigned. |
Quantity Ø You usually write in your journal every day at school. Ø You usually write in your journal at home when assigned. |
Quantity Ø You often write in your journal every day at school. Ø Sometimes you write in your journal at home when assigned. |
Quantity Ø You seldom write in your journal every day at school. Ø You hardly ever write in your journal at home when assigned. |
| Neatness Ø Entries are double-spaced Ø Your journal looks like you truly treasure reading, thinking, and writing. |
Neatness Ø Entries are usually double-spaced Ø Your entries are usually neat, clean, and well-cared for. |
Neatness Ø Some of the entries are doublespaced Ø Some of the entries in your notebook are clean and well-cared for. |
Neatness Ø Your journal is not neat, clean, and well-cared for. Ø Your journal looks as though you do not treasure writing. |
| Spelling, Punctuation, and Word Choice Ø You reread your journal with an editor’s eye—paying attention to mugshot errors, marking revisions when necessary. Ø Someone else can read your entries easily. |
Spelling, Punctuation, and Word Choice Ø You usually reread your journal with an editor’s eye—paying attention to mugshot errors, marking revisions when necessary. Ø Someone else can usually read your entries easily. |
Spelling, Punctuation, and Word Choice Ø Sometimes you reread your journal with an editor’s eye. Ø It’s often difficult for someone else to read your entries. |
Spelling, Punctuation, and Word Choice Ø You do not reread your journal with an editor’s eye. Ø It’s very difficult for someone else to read your entries. |
|
Category |
Fully Meeting Expectations 5 |
Meeting Expectations 3 |
Not Meeting 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
The assignment is completed according to directions and is neatly presented. | The assignment is almost completed according to directions and is somewhat neatly presented. |
The assignment is attempted but not completed correctly and/ or is difficult to read.
|
Note: A mark of 2 or 4 may be given and will be shown with a circle on the line.